Evidence and accuracy · 30%
Claims are sourced, assumptions are visible, calculations are reproducible and uncertainty is not hidden.
Academic-style open course · KECB-HER325
Document the building, people, labor, music, dance and community memory of a living cultural venue using ethical, source-based preservation practice.
Measurable learning
Assessment architecture
| Assessment | Weight |
|---|---|
| Scope and ethics plan | 10% |
| Source and timeline dossier | 15% |
| Oral-history project | 20% |
| Photograph and place record | 15% |
| Digital preservation plan | 15% |
| Final documented venue collection | 25% |
Academic integrity
Weekly sequence
Each week connects the free book library to a concrete tool or operating exercise. Instructors may substitute current peer-reviewed readings and local requirements.
Write a research question, scope boundary, stakeholder list and harm review.
Create a claim log with source, date, confidence and follow-up need.
Produce a ten-entry timeline with citations and contradiction notes.
Submit an interview plan, consent process and withdrawal procedure.
Conduct or simulate one interview and produce a contextualized summary rather than an unsupported transcript extract.
Catalog ten images or placeholders with source, rights status, date and description.
Create a room-by-room observation record and identify claims requiring expert review.
Create a collection plan that includes workers, artists, dancers and community participants.
Build a folder, naming, metadata and backup plan for the collection.
Draft a 500-word interpretation with source notes and an explicit uncertainty statement.
Create a stewardship memorandum naming owners, custodians, access rules and next review.
Deliver a documented venue collection and defend source choices, omissions, consent and uncertainty.
Common capstone rubric
Claims are sourced, assumptions are visible, calculations are reproducible and uncertainty is not hidden.
The work assigns owners, deadlines, resources, decisions and realistic next actions.
The plan considers workers, guests, artists, students, neighbors and community consequences.
Recommendations connect across departments and explain tradeoffs rather than listing disconnected tactics.
The final presentation is clear, concise and responsive to questions and contrary evidence.
Core source library
The assigned Keep ’Em Coming Back chapters and tools form the applied source base. Institutional instructors should add peer-reviewed scholarship and current official requirements.
Use the instructor resources for lesson planning, assessment blueprints, accessible delivery, bibliography records and capstone review.