Evidence and accuracy · 30%
Claims are sourced, assumptions are visible, calculations are reproducible and uncertainty is not hidden.
Academic-style open course · KECB-MUS310
Design a sustainable live-music portfolio, book and advance artists, operate show nights, develop audiences and evaluate program economics.
Measurable learning
Assessment architecture
| Assessment | Weight |
|---|---|
| Music ecosystem map | 10% |
| Format comparison brief | 10% |
| Booking and advance packet | 20% |
| Six-week promotion plan | 15% |
| Show-night simulation | 15% |
| Program economics memo | 10% |
| Final recurring-night proposal | 20% |
Academic integrity
Weekly sequence
Each week connects the free book library to a concrete tool or operating exercise. Instructors may substitute current peer-reviewed readings and local requirements.
Compare three possible nights and recommend one based on audience, room and operating capacity.
Produce a regional ecosystem map with at least twelve attributable nodes and relationship notes.
Create a compliance question log and route each question to an appropriate official source or professional.
Design operating standards for one participatory or listening-room format.
Write a decision memo selecting the right relationship model for a given room.
Create a format charter covering eligibility, timing, host authority and audience expectations.
Develop a consultation and sourcing plan before launching a culturally specific night.
Evaluate three offers and document both financial and operational risk.
Create a development ladder and communication standard for emerging acts.
Prepare a stage-flow plan and identify production assumptions requiring confirmation.
Write a door standard covering guest information, late changes and escalation.
Produce a six-week campaign with artist, venue and community responsibilities.
Submit an economics memo with assumptions, break-even range and sponsor boundaries.
Review a simulated eight-week data set and recommend continue, revise or stop.
Present a complete recurring-night proposal and answer questions from an artist, manager, guest and finance perspective.
Common capstone rubric
Claims are sourced, assumptions are visible, calculations are reproducible and uncertainty is not hidden.
The work assigns owners, deadlines, resources, decisions and realistic next actions.
The plan considers workers, guests, artists, students, neighbors and community consequences.
Recommendations connect across departments and explain tradeoffs rather than listing disconnected tactics.
The final presentation is clear, concise and responsive to questions and contrary evidence.
Core source library
The assigned Keep ’Em Coming Back chapters and tools form the applied source base. Institutional instructors should add peer-reviewed scholarship and current official requirements.
Use the instructor resources for lesson planning, assessment blueprints, accessible delivery, bibliography records and capstone review.