Production identity
- Target finished yield
- 8 kg · approximately 200 portions at 40 g
- Reference ratio
- Finished mass ÷ declared primary-input basis (batch reference ratio): 80.0% (10 kg declared primary input → 8 kg finished target)
- Total formula input
- 10 kg before trim, evaporation, absorption or transfer loss
- Time
- 30 min active · 120 min total
- Equipment
- 12 L nonreactive saucepan · immersion blender · scale · rapid-cooling setup
- U.S. major allergens intentionally present
- None intentionally declared in the formula; supplier labels and cross-contact still require verification.
- Additional sensitivity note
- None listed.
- Holding / service
- Hot hold only what service requires; cool remainder rapidly and refrigerate at 41°F / 5°C or below.
Formula — 1× target batch
| Ingredient | Weight | Specification |
|---|---|---|
| Tomato purée | 5 kg | |
| Cider vinegar | 1.5 kg | |
| Brown sugar | 1.2 kg | |
| Water | 900 g | starting adjustment |
| Worcestershire sauce | 350 g | check label for allergens |
| Yellow mustard | 300 g | |
| Kosher salt | 180 g | |
| Black pepper | 120 g | |
| Smoked paprika | 120 g | |
| Garlic powder | 80 g | |
| Onion powder | 80 g | |
| Cayenne | 40 g | |
| Molasses | 130 g |
Scaling table
Use the input-percentage column to audit transcription. The ½× and 2× columns scale ingredient mass only; process capacity must be revalidated.
| Ingredient | % of input mass | ½× | 1× | 2× |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomato purée | 50.00% | 2.5 kg | 5 kg | 10 kg |
| Cider vinegar | 15.00% | 750 g | 1.5 kg | 3 kg |
| Brown sugar | 12.00% | 600 g | 1.2 kg | 2.4 kg |
| Water | 9.00% | 450 g | 900 g | 1.8 kg |
| Worcestershire sauce | 3.50% | 175 g | 350 g | 700 g |
| Yellow mustard | 3.00% | 150 g | 300 g | 600 g |
| Kosher salt | 1.80% | 90 g | 180 g | 360 g |
| Black pepper | 1.20% | 60 g | 120 g | 240 g |
| Smoked paprika | 1.20% | 60 g | 120 g | 240 g |
| Garlic powder | 0.80% | 40 g | 80 g | 160 g |
| Onion powder | 0.80% | 40 g | 80 g | 160 g |
| Cayenne | 0.40% | 20 g | 40 g | 80 g |
| Molasses | 1.30% | 65 g | 130 g | 260 g |
Ingredient weights scale arithmetically; pan geometry, heat input, evaporation, fryer recovery, mixing shear, proofing/bake behavior and holding capacity do not. Revalidate process whenever batch size or equipment changes.
Method
Combine tomato, vinegar, sugar, water and molasses cold so concentrated sugars dissolve before the pan develops hot spots.
Bring to a controlled simmer, skim foam as needed, and add the dry spices only after the liquid is moving evenly.
Reduce while stirring the bottom frequently; measure finished weight rather than judging concentration only by clock time.
Blend if a smooth house texture is required, then retaste salt, acid, sweetness and chile after concentration has stopped.
Adjust only to the documented 8 kg finish, record batch pH if the operation uses pH as a quality-control metric, and cool rapidly if not going directly to service.
Working numbers
- Starting liquid/solid batch: approximately 10 kg
- Target finished yield: 8.0 kg / 80% of declared starting basis
- Reduction is controlled by finished weight, not an arbitrary simmer time
- Sauce should coat a spoon yet flow cleanly when warm
Production verification
- Record actual finished batch weight before portioning; compare with target and investigate material variance.
- Record actual portion count and portion mass during service rather than inferring count from target yield.
- Verify current supplier labels for major allergens and document cross-contact limits of the actual station/equipment.
- Record the process/temperature checkpoints that are critical to this formula under the venue’s approved food-safety procedure.
- Taste or otherwise evaluate the formula at its actual service temperature and after the realistic hold/travel interval.
Batch record: target yield ____ · actual yield ____ · actual portions ____ · critical process checkpoints ____ · service hold ____ · waste/rework ____ · sensory result ____ · corrective action ____.
Sensory standard
Tomato-forward and tangy with restrained smoke, integrated sweetness and pepper; glossy enough to cling without becoming jammy.
Evaluate the control batch at pickup and again after the realistic handoff or hold. The written standard should describe the point at which the formula is still sellable and the point at which it must be remade, repurposed under an approved plan or discarded.
Failure laboratory
| Failure | Likely mechanism | Correction |
|---|---|---|
| Sauce tastes flat and overly sweet | Reduction concentrated sugar faster than acid/seasoning was balanced | Finish acid and salt after reaching target weight, not before. |
| Scorched bitter note | Sugar-rich sauce sat on an under-stirred hot pan bottom | Use moderate heat, heavy cookware and frequent bottom scraping. |
Version control
KECB professional training formula; validate local regulatory requirements, supplier specifications and venue procedures before production. A measured correction to the recipe becomes a documented formula revision after a controlled test; do not let different cooks maintain invisible personal versions.