Evidence and accuracy · 30%
Claims are sourced, assumptions are visible, calculations are reproducible and uncertainty is not hidden.
Academic-style open course · KECB-ART315
Operate an artist–venue relationship from pitch and offer through advance, show day, settlement, repair and rebooking.
Measurable learning
Assessment architecture
| Assessment | Weight |
|---|---|
| Artist or venue one-sheet | 10% |
| Pitch and offer exercise | 15% |
| Agreement and advance packet | 20% |
| Role-switch show simulation | 20% |
| Settlement and post-show record | 15% |
| Final partnership operating system | 20% |
Academic integrity
Weekly sequence
Each week connects the free book library to a concrete tool or operating exercise. Instructors may substitute current peer-reviewed readings and local requirements.
Write the same event objective from the artist and venue perspective; identify conflicts and shared interests.
Create a one-sheet or venue buyer profile using only supportable claims.
Build an evidence inventory and mark every missing or unconfirmed asset.
Prepare two distinct pitches for two different rooms and explain the differences.
Map communications and approval authority for a multi-party event.
Negotiate a simulated offer and produce a clean deal memo.
Complete an advance packet and label every item confirmed, pending or not applicable.
Run a tabletop delay scenario and revise the day schedule.
Design a proportionate hospitality plan for three budget levels.
Analyze a show-day case and identify what each side should communicate before acting.
Complete settlement, discrepancy notes and a post-show record.
Create a shared promotion plan with minimum, expected and optional commitments.
Write a private repair sequence and a public response only where public response is justified.
Teams operate a simulated event, switch roles halfway through the course, and submit one shared operating agreement.
Common capstone rubric
Claims are sourced, assumptions are visible, calculations are reproducible and uncertainty is not hidden.
The work assigns owners, deadlines, resources, decisions and realistic next actions.
The plan considers workers, guests, artists, students, neighbors and community consequences.
Recommendations connect across departments and explain tradeoffs rather than listing disconnected tactics.
The final presentation is clear, concise and responsive to questions and contrary evidence.
Core source library
The assigned Keep ’Em Coming Back chapters and tools form the applied source base. Institutional instructors should add peer-reviewed scholarship and current official requirements.
Use the instructor resources for lesson planning, assessment blueprints, accessible delivery, bibliography records and capstone review.